Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training (CLEET) Law Enforcement Driver Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the CLEET Law Enforcement Driver Test. Use our multiple choice quizzes and flashcards, each with hints and explanations, to enhance your study sessions and be ready for the exam.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What constitutes evidence of negligence for an officer?

Engaging in emergency driving
Violation of state law during non-emergency driving
Following all driving regulations
Maintaining a speed limit during routine patrol

The correct answer is: Violation of state law during non-emergency driving

Violation of state law during non-emergency driving serves as a clear indicator of negligence for an officer because it demonstrates a failure to adhere to established legal standards of conduct while operating a vehicle. Officers are expected to follow the same laws that apply to the general public unless they are engaged in emergency driving situations that warrant a different standard of behavior. Non-emergency driving implies there is no immediate threat that justifies deviations from legal regulations. When an officer violates state law during routine driving, it suggests a lapse in judgment or adherence to duty, which can be considered negligent behavior. Negligence involves not meeting the responsibilities of one's role, and for law enforcement officers, these responsibilities include obeying traffic laws to ensure the safety of themselves, their passengers, and the public. On the other hand, actions like engaging in emergency driving may be justified, depending on circumstances; following regulations and maintaining speed limits during routine patrol are indicative of responsible behavior and do not signify negligence.